In Dunedin today it was warm with gusty northeasterlies but turned drizzly around 4pm. The high was 18°C, the low was 13°C.
How long does it take to read each book of the Bible? I found the graphic which prompted this post on the blog of Jeff Medders. There are also some fancier versions with the same numbers, an Old Testament one, and a New Testament version. As I was digging around the web researching this post I discovered that the source of the reading times appears to be the Desiring God article Three Tips for Better Bible Reading.
I also found another list with slightly different numbers here (if you click that link it will download the document).
What I have done is to combine the numbers to give a range of time to read each book, which I think is more realistic because we don’t all read at the same speed. Also, I suspect the Desiring God numbers may be a bit optimistic. For some books such as 1 & 2 Samuel, Desiring God only have one number for reading both books so I had to do a bit of an estimate to get the range. In these cases the time for reading both books as claimed by Desiring God is also listed.
I also found a list of the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade Level (lower is easier to read) for each book in the ESV (Crossway). The grade level is effectively equivalent to the expected reading level after that many years of school. This is more about how easy or difficult it is to parse each sentence rather than whether the passage is easy to understand. Also note that the algorithm chokes on poetry because it is weighted to assume short sentences are easier to read (hence the book of Job is rated as easy to read!)
- Genesis: 3 hrs 30 min – 4 hrs 35 min.
(50 chapters, 32,046 words) Reading level 6.3
- Exodus: 3 hours – 3 hrs 37 min.
(40 chapters, 25,957 words) Reading level 7.3
- Leviticus: 2 hours – 2 hrs 35 min.
(27 chapters, 18,852 words) Reading level 8.7
- Numbers: 3 hours – 3 hrs 35 min.
(36 chapters, 25,048 words) Reading level 8.5
- Deuteronomy: 2 hrs 30 min – 3 hrs 8 min.
(34 chapters, 23,008 words) Reading level 8.7
- Joshua: 1 hr 45 min – 2 hrs 8 min.
(24 chapters, 15,671 words) Reading level 9.4
- Judges: 1 hr 45 min – 2 hrs 5 min.
(21 chapters, 15,385 words) Reading level 7.4
- Ruth: 15 – 20 minutes.
(4 chapters, 2,039 words) Reading level 6.3
- 1 Samuel: 2 hrs 15 min – 2 hrs 45 min.
(31 chapters, 20,837 words) Reading level 6.4
- 2 Samuel: 1 hr 45 min – 2 hrs 18 min.
(24 chapters, 17,170 words) Reading level 6.7
- 1 & 2 Samuel: 4 hours
- 1 Kings: 2 hrs 8 min – 2 hrs 47 min.
(22 chapters, 20,361 words) Reading level 7.8
- 2 Kings: 2 hrs 8 min – 2 hrs 40 min.
(25 chapters, 18,784 words) Reading level 7.8
- 1 & 2 Kings: 4.25 hours
- 1 Chronicles: 2 hrs 15 min – 2 hrs 56 min
(29 chapters, 16,664 words) Reading level 8.7
- 2 Chronicles: 2 hrs 15 min – 3 hrs 2 min
(36 chapters, 21,349 words) Reading level 9.3
- 1 & 2 Chronicles: 4.5 hours
- Ezra: 40 – 58 minutes
(10 chapters, 5,605 words) Reading level 9.8
- Nehemiah: 1 hour – 1 hr 20 min
(13 chapters, 8,507 words) Reading level 8.9
- Esther: 30 – 40 minutes
(10 chapters, 4,932 words) Reading level 9.8
- Job: 1 hr 45 min – 2 hrs 49 min
(42 chapters, 12,674 words) Reading level 4.2
- Psalms: 5 hours – 7 hrs 38 min
(150 chapters, 30,147 words) Reading level 3.9
- Proverbs: 1 hr 45 min – 2 hrs 45 min
(31 chapters, 9,921 words) Reading level 5.3
- Ecclesiastes: 30 – 48 minutes
(12 chapters, 4,537 words) Reading level 6.0
- Song of Songs: 20 – 32 minutes
(8 chapters, 2,020 words) Reading level 4.9
- Isaiah: 3 hrs 45 min – 5 hrs 47 min
(66 chapters, 25,608 words) Reading level 5.5
- Jeremiah: 4 hours – 5 hrs 36 min
(52 chapters, 33,002 words) Reading level 7.5
- Lamentations: 20 – 36 minutes
(5 chapters, 2,324 words) Reading level 4.0
- Ezekiel: 3 hrs 45 min – 4 hrs 25 min
(48 chapters, 29,918 words) Reading level 7.1
- Daniel: 1 hr 15 min – 1 hr 20 min
(12 chapters, 9,001 words) Reading level 8.5
- Hosea: 30 – 51 minutes
(14 chapters, 3,615 words) Reading level 4.9
- Joel: 12 – 22 minutes
(3 chapters, 1,447 words) Reading level 5.6
- Amos: 25 – 43 minutes
(9 chapters, 3,027 words) Reading level 5.3
- Obadiah: 4 – 7 minutes
(1 chapter, 440 words) Reading level 6.1
- Jonah: 8 – 11 minutes
(4 chapters, 1082 words) Reading level 6.2
- Micah: 20 – 33 minutes
(7 chapters, 2,118 words) Reading level 5.6
- Nahum: 8 – 14 minutes
(3 chapters, 855 words) Reading level 3.8
- Habakkuk: 9 – 16 minutes
(3 chapters, 1,011 words) Reading level 4.3
- Zephaniah: 10 –17 minutes
(3 chapters, 1,141 words) Reading level 5.2
- Haggai: 7 – 9 minutes
(2 chapters, 926 words) Reading level 5.9
- Zechariah: 40 – 47 minutes
(14 chapters, 4,855 words) Reading level 6.9
- Malachi: 11 – 15 minutes
(4 chapters, 1,320 words) Reading level 6.3
- Matthew: 2 hrs 30 min – 2 hrs 55 min
(28 chapters, 18,346 words) Reading level 6.6
- Mark: 1 hr 30 min – 1 hr 55 min
(16 chapters, 11,304 words) Reading level 6.1
- Luke: 2 hrs 30 min – 3 hrs 10 min
(24 chapters, 19,482 words) Reading level 6.5
- John: 2 hours – 2 hrs 20 min
(21 chapters, 15,635 words) Reading level 5.6
- Acts: 2 hrs 15 min – 2 hrs 55 min
(28 chapters, 18,450 words) Reading level 8.3
- Romans: 1 hour – 1 hr 18 min
(16 chapters, 7,111 words) Reading level 7.1
- 1 Corinthians: 1 hour – 1 hr 10 min
(16 chapters, 6,830 words) Reading level 6.3
- 2 Corinthians: 38 – 40 minutes
(13 chapters, 4,477 words) Reading level 7.6
- Galatians: 20 – 25 minutes
(6 chapters, 2.230 words) Reading level 7.8
- Ephesians: 20 – 25 minutes
(6 chapters, 2,422 words) Reading level 11.7
- Philippians: 14 – 18 minutes
(4 chapters, 1,629 words) Reading level 9.0
- Colossians: 13 – 18 minutes
(4 chapters, 1,582 words) Reading level 9.0
- 1 Thessalonians: 12 – 15 minutes
(5 chapters, 1,481 words) Reading level 8.5
- 2 Thessalonians: 7 – 10 minutes
(3 chapters, 823 words) Reading level 8.8
- 1 Timothy: 16 – 20 minutes
(6 chapters, 1,591 words) Reading level 9.7
- 2 Timothy: 11 – 15 minutes
(4 chapters, 1,238 words) Reading level 9.1
- Titus: 7 – 10 minutes
(3 chapters, 659 words) Reading level 9.7
- Philemon: 3 – 5 minutes
(1 chapter, 335 words) Reading level 8.8
- Hebrews: 45 – 60 minutes
(13 chapters, 4,95 words) Reading level 9.5
- James: 16 – 20 minutes
(5 chapters, 1,742 words) Reading level 6.4
- 1 Peter: 16 – 22 minutes
(5 chapters, 1,684 words) Reading level 8.8
- 2 Peter: 10 – 12 minutes
(3 chapters, 1,099 words) Reading level 10.2
- 1 John: 16 – 20 minutes
(5 chapters, 2,141 words) Reading level 6.1
- 2 John: 2 – 3 minutes
(1 chapter, 245 words) Reading level 7.2
- 3 John: 2 – 3 minutes
(1 chapter, 219 words) Reading level 5.6
- Jude: 4 – 6 minutes
(1 chapter, 461 words) Reading level 8.5
- Revelation: 1 hr 15 min – 1 hr 40 min
(22 chapters, 9,851 words) Reading level 8.4
12 June 2018 update:
Over the last couple of months I’ve been reading the King James Version of the Bible and realised that another factor that will have an impact on how long it takes to read the Bible is the translation you use. This probably is a reasonably consistent factor across all books of the Bible though so I guess that for some translations like the KJV you could just assume it will always take a bit longer to read than for others such as the NIV.
Watched a movie about Enid Blyton this evening, she was not at all like I imagined her to be. She was a terrible mother, workaholic but clearly a prolific writer (750 published books!)
I’m looking at a paper written by some of my colleagues at the NZ National Poison Centre a few years back. This is an important topic for everyone to be aware of: Poisoning following exposure to chemicals stored in mislabelled or unlabelled containers: a recipe for potential disaster, by Yvette C Millard, Robin J Slaughter, Lucy M Shieffelbien, Leo J Schep; New Zealand Medical Journal 26th September 2014, Volume 127 Number 1403.
Every year people are accidentally poisoned due to hazardous substances being stored in the wrong containers or not being labelled properly. Often the substance is drunk from a bottle that is usually used for drink, such as soft drink, water, sports drink or milk bottles.
Who is at risk?
All age groups are at risk of poisoning in this way, but it is a particularly common way for adults to swallow nasty liquids by mistake. A common scenario is when the driver of a vehicle reaches for a drink bottle and inadvertently picks up a similar bottle containing oil, petrol or even antifreeze. Children are vulnerable because they associate the style of a food container with something they can eat or drink so are unaware of what it really contains.
How serious is this?
The consequences of this type of mistake can be fatal. There have been cases of people drinking paraquat by mistake because it had been kept in a drink bottle and this is almost inevitably fatal. Fortunately, most of the cases covered in by this study were unpleasant but not especially toxic.
Types of chemicals involved
Dishwashing liquid is very commonly stored in the wrong bottles. Petrol, diesel, two-stroke mix are also common culprits. Antifreeze, brake fluids, bleach, mineral turpentine, herbicides, methylated spirits, paint thinners, household cleaners all make the list. None of these are pleasant if you were expecting a refreshing drink of water or Gatorade.
It is illegal to store poisons in food containers
New Zealand food safety regulations explicitly prohibit storing chemicals or “any substance that could cause poisoning” in food containers, whether labelled or not. Yet still people do it. What I noticed in my time at the Poisons Centre is that this practise is surprisingly common in male-dominated workplaces (the list of chemicals involved backs this up). Maybe people think nobody is going to drink from a bottle on the shelf in the workshop anyway, or perhaps there is too much of a, “she’ll be right” attitude?
I do know that it shook all of us who were at work the day a call came through from a young man who had accidentally swallowed a mouthful of what turned out to be paraquat that was stored in a Coke bottle. We all knew his chances of surviving were not good.
ALWAYS KEEP POISONS IN THEIR ORIGINAL CONTAINERS!!
(No apologies for shouting.)
If you landed here expecting to see Mike’s blog, it has moved to MikeMcArthur.nz
See you there!
The PDF for today is one I downloaded as a freebie for subscribing to Ed Cyzewski’s blog a few years back. I’ve followed his blog on and off since around 2012. This same ebook is available on Amazon and NoiseTrade. The ebook is short, 47 pages of content. It is divided into sections so I will use those as headings in this summary.
In explaining why he has written an ebook focused on faith blogging, Ed states:
The goals for Christian blogs can become quite murky at times since we aspire to physically live out our faith. Thinking and writing about it simply won’t do for serious followers of Jesus.
I think of this from another angle: Because I’m seeking to live out my faith, my goals for blogging are strongly influenced by what I believe. This probably amounts to the same thing but is easier to get my head around.
In this section Ed extols the virtues of being succinct and to the point, then also recommends writers at least occasionally take the time to go deep on a particular topic.
Don’t be afraid that inviting others to contribute yo your blog will make you look like less of an expert, it will probably make you look better.
I do wonder how this can be applied to a personal blog like mine? A basic premise of my approach is that this blog is mostly about stuff I am interested in rather than being a ‘niche’ blog. Though, asking people who I’m curious to learn more about would be an obvious way to include the contributions of others. This is worth some consideration.
Becoming a better faith blogger begins with zeroing in on the essentials for a blog post
Ed points out how easy it is to ramble on about our faith, obscuring the message by telling too much detail in the stories we share.
Make your point. Tell your story. Keep. It. Moving.
Read and Link
By reading other blogs and noticing what they do well, we begin to improve our own writing. Follow other bloggers in your area of interest, know what is being discussed about a topic, be informed.
I also note that Ed specifically recommends reading high quality blogs. Just as the people we hang out with influence our thinking, what we are reading will influence both the content and quality of our writing.
We read other blogs in order to share our unique perspectives with existing conversations or to start new conversations that aren’t happening already.
Don’t try to pursue some abstract ideal of what a ‘good’ blogger should be. Write in a style and voice that is your own. This means finding a sweet spot between stiff formality and brash oversharing. A blog is not an academic journal, but neither is it drunken commiseration with your best mate.
… real life experiences, if shared with discretion, can be truly powerful.
A good question to ask in the context of being yourself is:
What does this look like to me?
An Unbound Niche
This section is a bit hard to sum up so I will just quote this one paragraph:
While we can’t always write for everyone, we can write for a niche in such a way that our work has its own integrity and power so that our niche is open and unbounded by insider jargon or divisive language.
Paint a scene
This is clearly an art, one which I have not mastered. The idea is to carefully paint a scene for the reader that draws them in and pulls them along. The big challenge is to engage readers in such a way as to make them care about what you are saying.
What Are You For?
Be a writer who builds up rather than tearing down. Twitter holds plenty of examples of folks tearing others down, don’t go there. This is a section that I think definitely applies to Christian bloggers – I’m baffled by the way supposedly Christian people write about other Christians in scathing and nasty ways. Disagreeing does not need to be nasty.
What Ed seems to be saying on this topic is to write about what you are wanting to build up and just leave behind the stuff you might be against. This enables you to write positively instead of standing in opposition to something you don’t like.
Ed recommends using humorous stories about ourselves to let others see us at our most cringe-worthy, embarrassed and vulnerable. People are able to relate to these sorts of stories.
I’m not even sure how to attempt this. Perhaps this shows it is something I need to try for myself and practise?
Ed uses examples of Christian bloggers to show what he means with each go the topics covered. All the links to these blogs are working in the version currently available via Noisetrade, except for the link to ‘Then I Like Being Naïve’ by Preston Yancey. Oddly the links to Ed’s newsletter sign up and his old blog at inamirrordimly, including the ‘women in ministry series’ which he mentions are broken.
Despite the examples of Christian bloggers, the ebook does not go into much detail about much that is specific to faith blogging, something I was looking for.
A summary I wrote of some of the current thinking on the role of serotonin (5-HT) in depression: Serotonin and Depression
This post is an attempt at summarising and explaining a paper called 5-HT and depression: is the glass half full? Authored by Trevor Sharp and Philip J. Cowen which was published in Current Opinion in Pharmacology, 2011 volume 11 pages 45–51.
The theory that abnormally low levels of the neurotransmitter serotonin (also called 5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) can cause depression is now 50 years old.
The theory arose when it was noticed that depressed patients had low serotonin levels in cerebrospinal fluid, and also that the first effective antidepressant drugs had the effect of increasing the amount of serotonin in the gap between neurons (the synaptic cleft). Since then the old tricyclic antidepressants have been replaced with medications that more accurately target serotonin, the ‘selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors’ (SSRIs) which have fewer adverse effects and tend to be more effective at relieving depression symptoms.
Despite the progress since 1967, up to half of the patients prescribed antidepressants do not get enough relief from their symptoms, and pharmacologists still don’t clearly understand how changes in serotonin translate to altered mood.
That 5-HT (serotonin) is associated with mood and depression has been shown by pharmacological studies and also positron emission tomography (PET) studies looking at the distribution of 5-HT receptors in the brains of depressed patients. Other studies have shown that artificially restricting dietary intake of the amino L-tryptophan can cause a return of depression symptoms in patients with a history of depression. This is significant because L-tryptophan is the precursor (chemical building block) of 5-HT. Similar L-tryptophan depletion in people who have a high family incidence of depression but themselves have not had depression caused a less severe lowering of mood.
Depression does run in families, with a moderate to high heritability (heritability is a measure of how likely a trait is inherited, low means less likely and high indicates it is more likely to be inherited in a population).
One particular gene, slc6a4, which codes for the 5-HT transporter protein, has been well studied. Levels of the 5-HT transporter can vary by up to sevenfold within the general population. Individuals with low levels of this 5-HT transporter have increased risk of depression when associated with stressful life events. The region of this gene where it is regulated (i.e., ‘the volume control’) is rich in methylation sites which can result in semi-permanent changes to gene expression as a result of environmental influences (such as a stressed or depressed mother during pregnancy, stressful events, childhood trauma).
Current thinking is that increased synaptic 5-HT activates a downstream gene programme that leads to enhanced neuronal plasticity which has failed because of the adverse effects of stress and other environmental and genetic factors.
In effect, some sort of stress derails the ongoing repair and maintenance of brain ‘circuitry’ which can be overcome by bumping up serotonin levels in neurons.
This idea of serotonin enabling improved neuronal plasticity in depressed patients dovetails nicely with ideas of how psychological treatments (such as counselling, CBT, DBT) function to help treat depression. Psychotherapists help a patient to reframe situations and learn more positive ways to view situations. With increased serotonin levels enabling neural repair and realignment of neural pathways, learning is facilitated and so the therapy and drug treatment work together.
As I dug through my notes in Evernote yesterday I found one about the 100 Day Project. The basic idea is to commit to creating something new everyday for 100 days. The website recommends choosing an object (or objects) you already have as the material for your project and then an action to do with that object.
What Is the 100-Day Project? It’s a celebration of process that encourages everyone to participate in 100 days of making. The great surrender is the process; showing up day after day is the goal. For the 100-Day Project, it’s not about fetishizing finished products—it’s about the process.
I was mulling this idea over while considering what to delete from my vast collection of unread pdfs (see yesterday’s post). Then I realised I can combine my goal of writing 365 blog posts in 2018 with all these pdf articles by using an article a day as a writing prompt. This gives me incentive to read all this stuff and also daily inspiration to write about.
Many of the articles I’ve saved are quite technical but there is lighter stuff in amongst it so you will get some variety. This will also give you some insight into my eclectic interests. I’m excited about this project as it will be fun to read these articles and to do something useful with them.
The start of the year is a good time to ‘clear the decks’ and cleanup excess stuff cluttering my shelves, home, workspace and mind. I began by reducing my clippings of websites/articles stored in Evernote from 6500 notes down to 3800. I still have some work to do to prune it right down to only the essential reference material I need to keep.
Starting back at work today I was confronted with an overflowing tray of paper that needs sorting, junk on my computer desktop, and a very full downloads folder. A common theme of all this stuff I have accumulated is that at the time of saving it I had some intention of reading it. Unfortunately I don’t have time to read everything.
I love information, it fascinates me to learn new facts, ideas or tips on how to do something better. When I was a kid the primary source of information was from books. I lived in a small country town with a small public library and few shops selling books. In this setting it was achievable to have read all the books available that interested me, and I did just that. It was possible to know the limits of the information available in my small world.
Now it is not possible to know the limits of information available to me with an internet connection. Yet I still have an information scarcity mindset. This belief causes me to hold on to sources of information despite understanding that by the time I get around to reading it that information is likely to be outdated. This is a costly mistake.
The thousands of pdfs stored on my computer are not only taking up bytes, they take up mental space and each causes a mild stress by being unread.
An Information Flood
Information is no longer scarce, we are flooded by it. In a flood the problem in not getting enough water, the real problem is keeping excess water out. Added to having too much water is the issue of it being dirty. There is water pouring in all over the place but it is so contaminated with filth that it is unusable, even hazardous. This is the situation we are now in with information.
Social media channels are like sewers, plenty of content running through them but little of true use to us. If I jump into the Twitter or Facebook feed I’m carried along in the torrent but all it does is waste my time. News websites are not much better, actual news stories are so similar to click bait that it can be tricky differentiating the two.
Search engines such as Google or Bing are not reliable conduits of clean information. They are like using the same bucket for bailing out flood water and collecting drinking water, cross contamination is constantly occurring.
To avoid the negative effects of misinformation we need to filter our sources. A clean stream can easily be muddied so I have to consciously filter all incoming sources, picking out what is helpful and leaving behind the trash. I do seek out good curators but what is considered useful to that person may not be relevant to me.
The ability to efficiently filter information, both from the flood and also from reliable sources, requires training. Fortunately my work and education have trained me reasonably well. Perhaps this is going to be the primary benefit of having a degree, learning how to identify reliable sources and developing critical thinking skills to discern what is most true.
In our society the scientific method and peer-review are held to be the best information filters. Working at a university I have ready access to such information but even that can go stale and outdated if stored too long.
Books used to be a great way to store and retrieve information, in some cases they still are. These days so much new information is being generated and it changes so fast that storing information is hardly with the trouble. Assuming I have internet access, all I need is the information required to go about my daily life and work. Holding on to more than that comes at a cost and it will be quickly outdated so unless what I need is historical records there is no point keeping old stuff. The obvious exceptions are photographs and family records.
So back to my original problem, I am flooded with information, I don’t need more and don’t need to keep it all. If I need to know something I can easily look it up. The cost of keeping what I’m not actively using is higher than the small effort required to find anything I want to know.
Rest in the Sun
What most of us need these days is a chance to ‘dry out’, an opportunity to escape the flood and catch our breath. This is related to my goal of reading books rather than blogs this year. I want to stem the tide of incoming information and clear out all the stuff I’m not able to keep up with. This should enable my mind to quieten down, think more clearly and create.